DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT QUALIFIED IN ANY WAY TO TEACH BUDDHIST PHILOSOPHY. I AM NOT A MONK, AND I AM NOT A PHILOSOPHER WITH ANY FORM OF ACADEMIC BACKGROUND ASSOCIATED WITH RELIGIOUS STUDIES. ‘DIAMOND SUTRA EXPLAINED’ IS A PERSONAL RECORD KEEPING OF MY WONDEROUS MIND, AND A STUDY OF THE BUDDHIST PHILOSOPHY. NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS.
FLAT WORLD AND BEYOND
Last time, we talked about the Samsara, the cycle of life and death, rebirth etc, etc...Didn't feel very philosophical at all huh? Sounds very... “religious” ...so lets get back on track. Sound like a lot of koo koo mumno jumbo right?
It’s completely fine to feel this way. I’m honestly not asking you to believe in ghosts and angels and all the wierd things. But please please bare with me. I promise you that this is gonna get way more logical and interesting.
So...the loop of life. Why is it rational to even believe in such thing? The after life, reincarnations, Buddha(s)...etc...Why is it even worth believing in anything beyond what we can perceive? The something, if anything, beyond the world we live in. Isn't science the only thing that is so definitive?
Well, lets talk about it.
Some call it God, or Gods...Buddhas, Angels, Spirits, Guardians, the Universe, Fate, etc, etc.
Whatever you call it, many of us can appreciate the notion of something beyond. Especially when you face difficulties...or even death.
I’m going to try to convince some skeptical ones out there. So those who only believe in things they can observe and experience…bear with me.
First, in most cases, that “something” would have some sort of supernatural power, or even all power…most of them would have some higher degree of knowledge, or all knowing…and some might even be compassionate and loving…but not all of them. Right?
Now, ignoring their personalities, preferences, and power; What’s common in all of them is that they are beyond the dimensions of our perceptions. In other words, they are beyond the three-dimensional world. God of Christianity, Buddhas of Buddhism, Gods of Egyptian mythology, the Greeks, the Chinese, the Japanese…etc etc. Not many of us claim that we have empirical and physical experiences with this “something”
Being beyond the 3D seems to be a common factor.
Now, before going 200% sceptical, let’s think about it logically. Why is it potentially true that there is something…or someone… beyond us?
Imagine a 2-dimensional world: A world with no depth. Just height and width. People who live in this very very flat world are also flat. They cannot perceive shapes, what they see are just lines and lines and lines. So, in this flat world Mr. Triangle and Miss. Square was having a chat about that something beyond. Obviouly they would see each other as a line, rather than a shape.
The conversation was packed with wonder and imagination.
Miss. Square was a bit sceptic… “What? There are beings beyond us? There are beings that are 3 dimensional? Cubes? Pyramids?..."
So, one day a three dimensional being came along. (A Cube) Because he’s a three dimensional being possessing qualities like up and down, he was floating in mid-air. Mr. Triangle and Miss. Square cannot perceive him as they can only see flat things, things that are on the flat world. The notion of up, down, and depth are basically non existent in their world.
The cube said, “Hello!” from above. Mr. Triangle and Miss. Square can hear the voice but cannot see him. They panicked.
The cube decided to land on the flat world. Mr. Triangle and Miss. Square can now see him! Not as a cube, not even as a square, a line. (as only one surface of the cube is on the flat world)
“How did you appear from no where?!” Mr. Triangle was shocked.
“You look just like me!” said Miss. Square…
The Cube laughed and decided throw Mr. Triangle and Miss. Square up in the air.
Both of them experienced the unimaginable reality of up and down. They saw objects that were not flat. The experienced something called depth. Slowly falling back to the flat world. This crazy experience was beyond their understandings. After descending back to the flat world…The cube was no longer there. The two tried to talk about their experience of the three-dimensional world but in their experience was indescribable, inexplainable, and inexpressible in their language because those concepts simply never existed.
They simply remained silent. And continuewd to wonder about the beyond...
I hope you get the point of this story here. If we (three dimensional beings) somehow experienced anything beyond, we would not be able express it in our language, understand what has just happened, or even record anything beyond the means of 3D. We can try, but it will never be accurate.
Now. can you be so certain that science, evidentialism, empiricism, all within the realm of 3D is everything there is to the world? Is our experience of the world so accurate and real? Is the chair you’re sitting on even real? And is your consciousness, ego, a sense of self, so so real and abiding? Perhaps not so much.
What we experience in the three-dimensional world is all chained to the three-dimensional world. We are very much prisoned by this. Our languages…bodies, and everything.
This is why Buddhism talks about the importance of emptiness, as once all is broken down, what holds appearance or form in the 3D world is really just a big illusion.
It holds no relevance or importance in realms beyond the 3D world. Like, a chair can only serve its functionality here because we possess the notion of sitting. We have a body that can/want to preform the act of sitting down. If you no longer possess a body…does the chair have any significance to you? No.
The practice of Buddhism very much follows this analogy. If you are enlighted (unchained and liberated from the 3D world). You would know that all that is here are merely illusions. Like a hologram. You would have no attachment towards notions like wealth, cars, body, self, etc as it serves nothing in the reality you are experiencing (beyond the 3D).
And this is also why the compassion and kindness we talk about in Buddhism is not really about accumulating merits or doing good deeds. It is pure logic.
Think about it. If all are illusions here. The differentiation between you and I are also an illusion.
I am YOU, and YOU are ME…
Not only that, YOU and I are in fact nothing more than nothing. Well, not exactly nothing. But empty. As once the appearance of you and I are broken, we realize that we are in fact one being…with no differentiation. We are not only one being but in fact empty by default. Therefore, compassion and kindness are really a practice of emptiness, emotionless-ness, detatchment, and selflessness. So that we do not cling.
Charity is not about giving away something for free. It is about realizing that you have never possessed it in the first place, to realize that it has no true value or significance beyond the realm of 3D. You are not supporting someone, but to realize that there is no difference between yourself and others. We have been, still am, and always will be one and empty.
Hence all compassion, generosity, and kindness is not the “nice” thing to do but the only rational thing to do.